A Beautiful Mind

Portraits of the mind

PROTO MAGAZINE
Winter 2011

A Beautiful Mind
by James Panero

It was the hippocampus as no one had ever seen it, illuminated in radiant hues. The image is called, aptly, a Brainbow, the colors serving a scientific purpose by highlighting specific neural structures. Yet their choice also reflects an artistic bent; scientists display the brain not the way it is (an undifferentiated gray) but the way we want to see it, “painted” with bursts of fluorescent color.

This image, created in 2005, is one of many that Carl Schoon­over, a doctoral candidate in neurobiology and behavior at Columbia University, has collected in his recent Portraits of the Mind: Visualizing the Brain From Antiquity to the 21st Century (Abrams). As science has probed the brain’s structure and function, scientists have had to rely on art to translate their discoveries to visual form.

Leonardo da Vinci created a notable example around 1500, borrowing the techniques of statue casting to inject wax into the ventricles of a freshly killed ox. After the wax cooled, he carved the brain away to create an impression of the cavity, then sketched this casting of the void, rendering it from multiple angles.

The arrival of powerful optics during the mid-nineteenth century enabled scientists to penetrate the brain’s microscopic dimensions. Soon another Italian, Camillo Golgi, inaugurated modern neuroscience by successfully staining individual neurons. In his 1875 drawing of a dog’s olfactory bulb, Golgi records his observations while also somewhat imagining the process of smell, with bulbs in the shape of root vegetables penetrating a layer of neural connections, depicted in fanciful wavy lines.

Whereas Golgi mistook the brain for an uninterrupted web of cells, the Spaniard Santiago Ramón y Cajal correctly saw it as a network of discrete neurons. Cajal had an interest in the Eastern practice of composing ink on paper in a way that stressed negative space. Using this spare approach in a 1903 sketch, Cajal took note of synaptic boutons, which are partly responsible for intercellular communication.

Even after micrographs came into use, artistic intervention continued. In portraying the brain’s vascular system, scientists chose minimal white to create an image as haunting as snowbound woods, with detail conveyed through contrast rather than color values.

“Orientation Columns” (2006), meanwhile, is ruled by overlapping primary colors, as in op art. The piece was created by tracking the activity in a monkey’s visual cortex as the primate observed lines at different angles, each color denoting the angle that certain neuron groups “preferred.” The very act of seeing has created a compelling image.

The Neighborhood Classics concert series

Header

James writes:

Dara and I recently had the privilege of hearing pianist Simone Dinnerstein perform Bach transcriptions from her new bestselling album. For a better understanding of her work, listen to Simone's appearance on WNYC's Soundcheck.

At dinner following the performance, Simone told us about an organization she founded in 2009 called Neighborhood Classics. This group organizes classical concerts in New York public schools. These concerts are family-friendly and raise money for the schools' students. Tonight, February 4 at 7pm, Simone will host a concert at PS 142 on Manhattan's Lower East Side. The performance will feature violinist Maria Bachmann and cellist Wendy Sutter playing the premiere of a work by Philip Glass. Tickets to this one-hour concert are only $15--and tickets are still available, online or at the door. This is a great cause, a great concert, at a great price. Check it out!

Groundhog Day on the Upper West Side

Another day, another resolution from Community Board 7. This volunteer board of neighborhood residents, hand picked by Councilwoman Gale Brewer and Borough President Scott Stringer, voted unanimously last night to oppose the conversion of the Alexander Hotel into a mens shelter, a story I first broke here.  

The resolution, though noble, left some questions unanswered:

  • What good is a non-binding resolution from CB7 when the Department of Homeless Services runs scared from its constituents
  • Why was a strongly worded amendment to that resolution narrowly voted down?
  • Where was the resolution condemning DHS's bad behavior last week?
  • What effect will Brewer's opposition have when she in fact advocated for the bad legislation that created this problem in the first place?

As one neighborhood resident put it in his comments to the board (video above): "Tomorrow is Groundhog Day, and I feel like we're reliving what happened previously on 94th Street and even the last couple of meetings. ... the people in this community care about what is happening to our property values and what is happening to our neighborhood."

The Columbia Spectator has published its own account of the evening:

Residents took another step Tuesday night in what has been a long—and loud—fight to keep another homeless shelter from coming to the Upper West Side.

At its full board meeting, Community Board 7 unanimously passed a resolution strongly opposing a transitional shelter at the Hotel Alexander on 94th Street...

“The community board is doing their part of the game,” 94th Street resident Itzhak Epstein said.

Epstein said he’s glad the resolution passed, including the call for a “fair share” analysis to examine the concentration of homeless shelters on the Upper West Side, but he’s not convinced it will carry much weight since community board resolutions are non-binding.

“I’m in favor, but as I said, ‘strongly oppose’ means the community board can’t do anything,” he said. “What will the mayor’s office do? Nothing. It’s a done deal, the government will go on and do as it wishes.”

Will this government, in fact, go on and do as it wishes? Is our local representation more intractable than foreign dictatorships?

If the recent community pushback is any indication, the mood of this neighborhood has changed. Its residents are starting to question their leadership, especially those that hide behind a rhetoric of benevolence while creating legislation that is good for no one. This was the message that came out from the community group Neighborhood in the Nineties when it recently indicated how concerned residents can continue to express their opposition to the shelter and the legislation that opens the way for more:

What Should WE do? 1. Get on the phone.
START with City Council Member Gale Brewer.
SWAMP HER OFFICE WITH CALLS: 212.788.6975
Gale founded the Task Force that took on the hotels in the name of affordable housing (a worthy, but unattainable goal). Although the bill was passed in Albany, it is her responsibility as our representative to take steps to stop the flooding of this district with more special needs populations.
Ask Gale Brewer to use all her resources, do all that is in her power N O W !!!:
· Issue a City Council Resolution, hold Hearings, have a News Conference demanding an end to No-Bid Contracts that waste our taxpayer dollars while doing nothing to provide real housing for the homeless
· Issue a City Council Resolution and hold Hearings on the issuance of no-bid contracts by the Mayor’s Office and City Agencies. There should be a Moratorium on rich contracts to buildings owners for housing special needs/homeless populations immediately. The City needs a long-term plan to house the homeless in appropriate facilities throughout the City NOW!!
· Request that she show up at the Community Board meeting Tuesday. [ED NOTE--she did not show up to last night's meeting, and instead Brewer was shouted down at a protest in Brooklyn concerning her opposition to a new neighborhood charter school]

Below is a post-mortem report on the CB meeting from Aaron Biller, president of Neighborhood in the Nineties--